Garland Pollard, a writer, web editor and SEO consultant writes “Is there too much branding?

He continues, “… must we all be so concerned with branding? Isn’t a good brand really the result of a moral, well-run company? Isn’t it better that hospitals focus on patients, and let the “branding” speak for itself? Do churches really need to “brand” themselves, or is it better that they focus on saving souls? Do we really need for banks to have visual identities, or do we want them to treat us properly when we make a deposit? Is the most recent mania for branding yet another management fad that we use to obscure coercion, duplicity and manipulation?”

Taking those in bite size pieces:

“Is there too much branding?”

A.) No, there is not “too much branding” anymore than there are too many interesting, purpose driven people making honorable contributions to the world.  There is far too much talk about branding and too many quick fix, faux solutions applied that actually distort the power of brand.

“Must we all be so concerned with branding?”

B.) Yes, in global and competitive markets we should all be concerned with branding; differentiating our organizational value in a memorable way is critical to vitality.

“Isn’t a good brand really the result of a moral, well-run company?”

C.) Yes, exactly! A good brand is the result of a moral, well-run company. But how does a working community define a moral company and align a well-run company without a shared identity and concerted purpose?

“Isn’t it better that hospitals focus on patients, and let the “branding” speak for itself?”

D.) Yes, hospitals should focus on patients. Healthy “brand philosophies” align the operating objectives of hospitals with the patient needs and expectations.

Appreciating that everyone, from patients to our nation as a whole, expects more than just advanced health-care today demands that hospitals offer more than quality recovery.

E.) Strong brands rarely, if ever just emerge from the operational routine to speak explicitly and align strategically.

“Do churches really need to “brand” themselves, or is it better that they focus on saving souls?”

F.) This not an either or proposition. Churches most certainly need to distinguish one from another in an effort to save souls. Churches passionate about their “call” want to speak beyond the pulpit to the people that are hoping for a message of hope and membership. Pentecostal? Down-to-earth? Fiscally transparent and accountable? Humanitarian outreach focused? Missions supportive? What a church represents is a story worth telling.

“Do we really need for banks to have visual identities, or do we want them to treat us properly when we make a deposit?”

G.) Yes, yes, and yes. A compelling brand ensures that your teller will treat you properly when making a deposit. The goal is to align what you do and how you do it around a simple, relevant and meaningful concept (brand promise) that can be delivered consistently provokes interest and woos customers.

I attempted to make a deposit with the wrong paperwork just recently. A logo on the slip would have been time saving for everyone waiting in line.

“Is the most recent mania for branding yet another management fad that we use to obscure coercion, duplicity and manipulation?”

H.) Identity matters. Buyers report that a cohesive brand for a relevant product/service eliminates the mental tug of war that they face when they make buying decisions.